Politics : Non-Profits In Politics
Share your experience in this category Local Businesses in this CategoryNon-Profits In Politics
Posted by:WOMFING TOM Rating 10 10 `Helper`There is a big stink over Columbia Riverkeepers involvement in the recall of Clatsop County Commissioners including a complaint filed with the IRS regarding CRK's status as a non-profit.
I would also like to point out that the local organizer/volunteer/staffer, whatever you wish to label her, Olivia Schmidt signed her emails not just representing CRK but also on behalf of Oregon Sierra Club, yet another outside organization obviously involved in local politics. If the investigation into misuse of non-profit status proceeds against CRK it should most certainly proceed against the Oregon Sierra Club. The Portland Audubon Society is also suspect in all this outside agitation. These organizations are guilty by association of misusing their non-profit status and inflicting pain on our communtiy and it's residents.
At very least, if you have been contributing to these organizations in the past you should reconsider your support.
Official Business Replies (0) ←
You need to be logged in as a business with a valid E-Lert account to make an official business response.
How to become an official business
User Responses
Not Fair
Posted by: columnclimber Rating 42 42 `Influencer`Posted 8 Dec 2009
I don't think it's fair to lump all these organizations together in these recalls. I also don't think it's right if people who don't actually work for those organizations use their membership to try and upset local government.
And the stink can stick to whatever touches it too.
Posted by: patrickmcgee Rating 13 13 `Helper`Posted 8 Dec 2009
I guess one could make a big stink about the ethics of certain Clatsop County Commissioners, under recall prtition, taking cash contributions from the private coporations they are sitting in judgement of as well, couldn't one Tom?
Here's What IRS Says
Posted by: patrickmcgee Rating 13 13 `Helper`Posted 8 Dec 2009
From IRS; Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances. For example, certain voter education activities (including the presentation of public forums and the publication of voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity.
In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the vote drives, would not constitute prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner. On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that: (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.
And from IRS's recent history in dealing with these kind of alleged violations, if they are even reviewed at all, the most one could expect from IRS would be an admonition to..."not do that anymore!!!"...unless the the violation is extrtemely aggregious(sp)but, we all know what this is about don't we?
Every politician....
Posted by: vernjohnson Rating 8 8 `Blogger`Posted 8 Dec 2009
...takes contributions, McGee. There is nothing illegal nor unethical about it.
Yes but how many .......
Posted by: patrickmcgee Rating 13 13 `Helper`Posted 8 Dec 2009
Have the integrity Bartoldus and in the interest of those they serve and do the "Public Business" of and know the sensitivity of the ethics of such a situation refuse to accept it?
Looks to me that so far and involving those particular Clatsop County Commissioners under "Petition for Recall", we are batting 1000 for not being blessed with that kind of integrity.
Aren't there rules here about harassing people?
Posted by: cbartoldus Rating 0 0 `Blogger`Posted 9 Dec 2009
Tom, I am really tired of hearing third and fourth hand that McGee is off on some other forum pretending I am some other person and supposedly having conversations at me. People google and I am supposedly having half baked conversations with this, um, person who appears unduly focused on me. Whoever Vern Johnson is 1) He certainly is NOT me and deserves to be addressed by the name he has chosen to use on WOMF 2) I am not a "public" figure, there is no justification to Mr. McGee's pretending I am other people. Please, remove the post(s) in which he calls other people by my name and ask that he stop, please.
Respond
We have three rules - please follow them, please respect them.
- Don't Advertise: businesses can talk to consumers, but not blatantly self-promote
- Be Nice: if you have a complaint, provide feedback to the business on how they can improve
- Comments considered defamatory will be removed
Please read our Terms & Conditions for more details on site policy.